Discussion about this post

User's avatar
frank b's avatar

We need to stop calling foreigners who enter our country illegally "immigrant" or "migrants". They're not; immigration is a legal process. And using the vocabulary of the progressives sets up the political dynamic they seek. "Immigrants" evokes sympathy, justifying the help our governments force our citizens to give them. "Illegal aliens" sounds less noble, and using that designation exposes the realism of the fact that we have no obligation to support them with social services instituted by Americans for Americans.

Before you call me a hater, I do respect these unfortunate people and dilemma facing them as they try to escape bad conditions in search of better lives. I know and have known, quite a number of people from south of our borders, who, as one of them put it, "have problems with their papers". They're nice people, generally, just seeking to improve their lot in life, and some individuals I've helped do that.

However, their challenges do not oblige us to sacrifice our own well-being, our culture, our social order, for the sake of improving their lives. And to those who think it does, I suggest offering them places in your own homes and supporting them yourselves, rather than expecting the rest of us to fund your chosen endless, self-imposed task of rescuing the world. Opening our borders to all comers indiscriminately will destroy our country; you can't have a "country" without borders.

Expand full comment
James McCarthy's avatar

IMO, Republicanism has morphed from a political party to an ideological entity if it is in fact an entity. Hardly heard from that group is an appeal to a republican form of government.

Political participation is not a timed event but a process especially one that provides maximum participation by the voters to select representatives. A curtailed period to count votes would tend to disenfranchise particularly military service personnel not to mention expats. Moreover, an abbreviated time period would tend to favor the very emotional-laden choice mechanism that concerned the authors of the Constitution.

Affording he electorate within the 350 million US residents a reasonable period of time to case a ballot enhances the participatory nature of voting. Community sensibility currently is reflected in the level of participation in the voting process which has increased in recent years. What's to fear?

Your vote for representatives opposed to "twisted versions of socialism" is your right. Fascism and naziism hardly fit into that bucket. Hunter's laptop is a red herring. The promise by the leading Republican candidate to extract retribution upon opponents and his plan to deconstruct the national government are redolent of fascism and naziism.

The US Senate and Electoral College were created as structural bulwarks against popular government and as a measure to ensure an "elite expert class" persisted to guide the nation. Sound like Trump and his acolytes?

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts